Sentencing — DNA surcharge

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 8, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — DNA surcharge — modification

Ceso Sprewell, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to vacate a DNA surcharge and his motion for sentence modification. We reject Sprewell’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP1974-CR State v. Sprewell

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Watts, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Sprewell, Ceso, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Wittwer, Jacob J., Madison

Related Content

Adoption Petition

In the case concerning the adoption of M.M.C. by A.M.B.'s nonmarital partner T.G., the Supreme Court of Wiscon[...]

May 6, 2024

Due Process-Employment

The case primarily focused on the procedural aspects of Andrade's dismissal following controversial social med[...]

May 6, 2024

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel-Resentencing

Hill appealed his conviction for first-degree reckless injury and physical abuse of a child, arguing that he w[...]

May 6, 2024

Suppression of Evidence-DNA Analysis

Raymand Vannieuwenhoven appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of two counts of first[...]

May 6, 2024

Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act

Asif Sayeed and three related healthcare firms were found culpable for breaching the Anti-Kickback Statute and[...]

May 6, 2024

International Child Abduction Remedies Act

Asli Baz, a German citizen, initiated legal action under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA[...]

May 6, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event