Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 13, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Alfredo J. Holliman, Jr. appeals a judgment convicting him of delivery of a controlled substance-cocaine (one gram or less) as a second or subsequent offense. See Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1g. & 961.48(1)(b) (2011-12). He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The sole issue on appeal is whether Holliman’s postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel set forth sufficient material facts to warrant a Machner hearing. See State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). The circuit court concluded that it did not. We agree and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP1515-CR State v. Holliman

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dugan, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Babe, Katie, Pewaukee; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event