Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing — accurate information

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 23, 2014//

Sentencing — accurate information

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 23, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — accurate information

Jameil A. Garrett appeals his judgment of conviction and the circuit court’s denial of his postconviction motion, contending that the court sentenced him on inaccurate information, namely “the unwarranted assumption Mr. Garrett acted with an intent to kill” the victim. Garrett has failed to convince us that the court’s “assumption” was inaccurate. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2013AP1178-CR, 2013AP1179-CR State v. Garrett

Dist II, Kenosha County, Rossell, J., Gundrum, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Paulson, Randall E., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Wren, Christopher G., Madison; Zapf, Robert D., Kenosha

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests