Sentencing — modification

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — modification

Robert Taylor, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that denied Taylor’s motion for sentence modification. Taylor contends that he is entitled to sentence modification based on: (1) a change in parole policy; (2) a disparity between his sentence and the sentence of his co-actor; (3) the circuit court’s reliance on inaccurate information at sentencing; (4) Taylor’s inability to currently participate in the Earned Release Program (ERP); and (5) Taylor’s cooperation with law enforcement. We conclude that Taylor is not entitled to sentence modification. We affirm the circuit court order denying sentence modification as a proper exercise of the court’s discretion. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP2425-CR State v. Taylor

Dist II, Racine County, Ptacek, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Taylor, Robert R., pro se; For Respondent: Chiapete, W. Richard, Racine; Probst, Robert, Madison