Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 15, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Michael L. Cramer appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree reckless homicide, and the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Cramer contends: (1) the State “presented demonstrably false and misleading testimony at the trial that violated” his right to due process; (2) he should get a Machner hearing on his claim that his trial lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation; and (3) he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We affirm. Publication in the official reports is not recommended

2012AP2547-CR State v. Cramer

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Martens, Wagner, JJ., Fine, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: FitzGerald, Patricia A., Mt. Horeb; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; O’Brien, Daniel J., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event