Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 1, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — new trials — juror bias

Edward Smart appeals a judgment of conviction for operating while revoked and eighth-offense operating while intoxicated and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Smart argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel for several reasons, the trial court erroneously failed to strike a juror for cause, and he should receive a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject Smart’s arguments, and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP2278-CR State v. Smart

Dist III, Iron County, Madden, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Petersen, Melissa M., Hager City; For Respondent: Lipske, Martin J., Hurley; Remington, Christine A., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event