Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — plea withdrawal — newly discovered evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 11, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — plea withdrawal — newly discovered evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 11, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — plea withdrawal — newly discovered evidence

Reginald M. Clytus, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06. He argues: (1) that he received ineffective assistance from his postconviction lawyer; (2) that he should have been placed under oath during the plea hearing; (3) that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because the circuit court’s plea colloquy was inadequate to establish that he understood the plea; and (4) that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP1443 State v. Clytus

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Clytus, Reginald M., pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests