By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 11, 2013//
By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 11, 2013//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — plea withdrawal — newly discovered evidence
Reginald M. Clytus, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06. He argues: (1) that he received ineffective assistance from his postconviction lawyer; (2) that he should have been placed under oath during the plea hearing; (3) that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because the circuit court’s plea colloquy was inadequate to establish that he understood the plea; and (4) that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Clytus, Reginald M., pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee