Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 29, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 29, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Warren Jamaal Wells, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion, filed under Wis. Stat. § 974.06, seeking relief from his conviction for first-degree intentional homicide while armed and as a party to a crime. He claims that the State improperly charged him as a party to a crime without also charging and prosecuting a co-actor, and that the two lawyers who represented him at trial were ineffective for failing to investigate, to present certain witnesses, and to make appropriate motions. He alleges that his postconviction lawyer was ineffective for failing to raise these claims. We reject his arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP149 State v. Wells

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Wells, Warren Jamaal, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Pray, Eileen W., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests