Sentencing — accurate information

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 11, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — accurate information — undue harshness

Craig Tuchalski appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that he is entitled to sentence modification or resentencing on the following grounds: (1) the court relied on inaccurate information in imposing his sentence; (2) the sentence imposed was unduly harsh in comparison to the sentences of his co-defendants; and (3) the court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying him eligibility for the Challenge Incarceration Program (CIP) and the Earned Release Program (ERP). We reject each of these contentions. Accordingly, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP1057-CR State v. Tuchalski

Dist IV, Clark County, Counsell, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Harless, Sarah Mae, Eau Claire; For Respondent: Wellman, Sally L., Madison; Zwieg, Darwin L., Neillsville