Free Newsletter
Sentencing – modification — new factors
By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 5, 2013//
Listen to this articleWisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Sentencing – modification — new factors
Philip Nelson, pro se, appeals an order denying sentence modification. Nelson argues new factors justify resentencing. We reject his arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Washburn County, Harrington, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Nelson, Philip G., pro se; For Respondent: Bitney, Jerome M., Shell Lake; Remington, Christine A., Madison
Polls
Loading ...Legal News
- Milwaukee mayor condemns anti-Semitism, renews calls for justice
- Wisconsin Supreme Court says an order against an anti-abortion protester violated First Amendment
- Prosecutors charge second inmate in assault that left Wisconsin youth prison counselor brain-dead
- Wisconsin Elections Commission rejects recall attempt against state’s top Republican
- ‘Trailblazing’ jurist and civil rights leader sculpture to be unveiled in Madison
- Wisconsin joins coalition urging court to uphold FTC’s ban on deceptive TurboTax advertising
- Marquette Law School Poll survey of Wisconsin finds Biden and Trump tied
- Wisconsin Supreme Court seeks investigation after abortion draft order leaks
- Man sentenced for impersonating a federal officer and wire fraud
- Illinois man rejects deal to plead guilty to 7 murder charges in Highland Park 4th of July shooting
- Wisconsin Court: Man’s Fourth Amendment rights violated
- Judge allows disabled voters in Wisconsin to electronically vote from home
Case Digests
- Suppression of Evidence
- Condemnation Powers-“Pedestrian Way”
- Insurance-Statute of Limitations-Sanctions
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Evidence
- Seizure-Reasonable Suspicion-Jury Instructions
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Collective Action-Overtime Wages-Arbitration
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Delayed Disclosure-Mistrial Motion
- Sixth Amendment-Request for Jury Trial
