Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — double jeopardy
John Bullock appeals a judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree sexual assault, as a party to a crime, and an order denying postconviction relief. Bullock argues: (1) his trial attorney was ineffective; (2) his convictions violate double jeopardy; (3) he was denied his right to an impartial jury; (4) the circuit court improperly admitted certain evidence; (5) insufficient evidence supports his convictions; (6) the real controversy was not fully tried; and (7) he is entitled to resentencing. We reject Bullock’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Eau Claire County, Lenz, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Harless, Sarah Mae, Eau Claire; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Wright, Brian H., Eau Claire