Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — double jeopardy

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — double jeopardy

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — double jeopardy

John Bullock appeals a judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree sexual assault, as a party to a crime, and an order denying postconviction relief. Bullock argues: (1) his trial attorney was ineffective; (2) his convictions violate double jeopardy; (3) he was denied his right to an impartial jury; (4) the circuit court improperly admitted certain evidence; (5) insufficient evidence supports his convictions; (6) the real controversy was not fully tried; and (7) he is entitled to resentencing. We reject Bullock’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP107-CR State v. Bullock

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Lenz, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Harless, Sarah Mae, Eau Claire; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Wright, Brian H., Eau Claire


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*