Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Torts — contact sports immunity — paintball

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 31, 2012//

Torts — contact sports immunity — paintball

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 31, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Torts — contact sports immunity — paintball

Jett Houston appeals a summary judgment dismissing his negligence and recklessness claims against Alex Freese and Freese’s insurer, Farmington Mutual Insurance Co., for injuries Houston suffered during a paintball game. The circuit court determined that paintball is a contact sport under Wis. Stat. § 895.525(4m)(a).[2] Therefore, Freese could only be liable if he was reckless, not merely negligent. Further, the court concluded Freese was not reckless based on undisputed facts. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP2441 Houston, et al. v. Freese, et al.

Dist III, Polk County, Galewyrick, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Lindell, James E., Minneapolis, Minn.; For Respondent: Pelish, James A., Rice Lake; Heaney, Patrick G., Rice Lake

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests