Sentencing — modification

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 31, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — modification

Mack Simmons, pro se, appeals from two judgments of conviction for burglary and one judgment of conviction for burglary as a party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.10(1m)(a) and 939.05 (2009-2010). He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing and when it denied the motion for sentence modification. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP2322-CR, 2011AP2323-CR State v. Simmons

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cimpl, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Simmons, Mack, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Weinstein, Warren D., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event