Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing – discretion – resentencing — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 24, 2012//

Sentencing – discretion – resentencing — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 24, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing – discretion – resentencing — ineffective assistance

Souvannaseng Boriboune, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are: (1) whether Boriboune’s motion to modify his sentence based on the circuit court’s alleged misuse of sentencing discretion is untimely; (2) whether the circuit court violated Boriboune’s constitutional rights when it increased his term of initial incarceration on resentencing; and (3) whether Boriboune received ineffective assistance of postconviction or appellate counsel. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP347-CR State v. Boriboune

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Conen, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Boriboune, Souvannaseng, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Larson, Sarah K., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests