Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing — modification; postsentencing assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 15, 2012//

Sentencing — modification; postsentencing assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 15, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — modification; postsentencing assistance

Quentin Cortez Ward, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Ward asserts that certain post-sentencing assistance that he provided to law enforcement warranted an adjustment to his sentence. The circuit court concluded that Ward had not fulfilled the necessary burden and denied the motion. We agree with the circuit court’s conclusion, so we affirm. This opinion shall not be published.

2011AP1502-CR State v. Ward

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Martens, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Ward, Quentin Cortez, pro se; For Respondent: Gansner, William L., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests