Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Evidence — sexual assault — prior false allegations

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 13, 2012//

Evidence — sexual assault — prior false allegations

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 13, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Evidence — sexual assault — prior false allegations

Tom Williams, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction, entered on a jury verdict, for second-degree sexual assault, by use of force. On appeal, Williams contends the court erroneously excluded evidence pursuant to the rape shield law, the victim perjured herself at trial, and the court was biased against him. He also asserts portions of the court reporter’s stenographic notes are missing, the court erred by excluding one of his witnesses, and his trial attorney was ineffective. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1587-CR State v. Williams

Dist III, Marathon County, Howard, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Williams, Tom O., pro se; For Respondent: Heimerman, Kenneth J., Wausau; Probst, Robert, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests