Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Municipalities — intermunicipal boundary agreements

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 6, 2011//

Municipalities — intermunicipal boundary agreements

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 6, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Municipalities — intermunicipal boundary agreements

The Village of Kimberly appeals a judgment declaring that an intermunicipal agreement it entered into with the Town of Buchanan was not a “boundary agreement” for purposes of Wis. Stat. §§ 66.0217(14)(a)2. and 66.0301. The Village argues: (1) the circuit court erroneously applied the 2007-08 version of § 66.0301, instead of the 2005-06 version; and (2) the intermunicipal agreement qualifies as a boundary agreement under the 2005-06 version of the statute. We conclude that, even under the 2005-06 statute, the intermunicipal agreement is not a boundary agreement. We therefore affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP93 Town of Buchanan v. Village of Kimberly

Dist III, Outagamie County, Dyer, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Koehler, Charles D., Appleton; For Respondent: St. Peter, John A., Fond du Lac; Parmentier, Matthew, Fond du Lac

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests