By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 23, 2011//
Family
Maintenance; modification
Michael C. Prue appeals an order that denied his motion to terminate or reduce the maintenance awarded to Lucinda K. Prue. Michael argues that the circuit court erred when it determined that Michael had not established a substantial change in circumstances requiring a reduction in the maintenance award. We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion when it denied Michael’s motion, and therefore affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP1847 In re the marriage of: Prue v. Prue
Dist IV, Dane County, McNamara, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Prue, Michael C., pro se; For Respondent: Webb, Daphne, Madison; Potter, Jared, Brookfield