Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 10-3392 Jones v. Cross

10-3392 Jones v. Cross

Prisons Prison discipline Specific intent is not an element in a prison disciplinary proceeding. “Jones argues that his lack of access to the evidence prevented him from presenting what he calls his actual innocence defense. As noted above, according to Jones, he is not guilty of assault because he lacked the specific intent required for assault—the intent to ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*