Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

10-2713 Abner v. Scott Memorial Hospital

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 9, 2011//

10-2713 Abner v. Scott Memorial Hospital

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 9, 2011//

Listen to this article

Civil Procedure
Appeal; length of brief; sanctions

Flagrant violations of FRAP 32 may warrant dismissal of the appeal.

“The flagrancy of the violation in this case might well justify the dismissal of the appeal: let this be a warning. But in addition it is plain from the briefs that the appeal has no merit. To allow time for the appellants to file a compliant brief and the appellees to file a revised brief in response, and to reschedule oral argument, would merely delay the inevitable.”

Affirmed.

10-2713 Abner v. Scott Memorial Hospital

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Young, J., Posner, J.

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests