Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2009AP2104 Woelfel, et al. v. Homestead Mutual Insurance Company

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 2, 2011//

2009AP2104 Woelfel, et al. v. Homestead Mutual Insurance Company

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 2, 2011//

Listen to this article

Insurance
Bad faith

Homestead Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a jury’s verdict that a silo on the dairy farm operated by Kris and Julie Woelfel and City View Dairy, LLC (collectively the Woelfels), collapsed due to an explosion and awarding the Woelfels bad faith and punitive damages because of Homestead’s denial of coverage for the damages caused by the collapse. Homestead raises five issues on appeal: whether the jury instruction defining “explosion” was proper, whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion in admitting into evidence burned barn boards produced just one week before trial, whether a mistrial should have been granted due to improper closing argument, and whether bad faith and punitive damages claims should have been submitted to the jury. We affirm the judgment. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP2104 Woelfel, et al. v. Homestead Mutual Insurance Company

Dist II, Calumet County, Poppy, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Terwilliger, W. Thomas, Wausau; Pless, Erik J., Green Bay; For Respondent: Cook, Gregory J., Milwaukee; Lawrence, Scott, St. Nazianz

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests