By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 9, 2010//
Probation and Parole
Revocation
David A. Blecker appeals a judgment affirming the revocation of his probation. He contends the revocation was based on insufficient evidence that was not credible, probative or substantial, in part because it depended on statements that should be considered part of a polygraph examination, and it was unfair to require him to report conduct that he did not know was wrong and of which he had not been given a fair warning. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. This opinion will not be published.
2009AP2877 State ex rel. Blecker v. Schwartz
Dist III, Chippewa County, Cray, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Bednarek, Jonas B., Madison; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Potter, Kevin C., Madison; Theisen, Jon, Chippewa Falls