By: dmc-admin//May 31, 2010//
Sentencing
Restitution; ability to pay
Gregory G. Hollingsworth appeals from a judgment convicting him of aggravated battery with intent to cause bodily harm and from an order denying his postconviction motion to reduce the monthly restitution payment to the victim. Hollingsworth argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his restitution hearing and that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in ordering restitution beyond his ability to pay. We disagree and affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2009AP1665-CR State v. Hollingsworth
Dist II, Walworth County, Carlson, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Pinix, Matthew S., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Koss, Phillip A., Elkhorn; Defort, Eric D., Madison