2009AP77 Sweeney v. Petska, et al.

By: dmc-admin//March 8, 2010//

By: dmc-admin//March 8, 2010//

Listen to this article

Civil Procedure
Amendment of complaint

Patrick Sweeney appeals an order denying a motion to amend his complaint. Sweeney contends the circuit court erred by denying the motion because justice requires an amendment of the pleadings. Sweeney also claims he should have been allowed to amend the complaint to conform to the evidence. We reject Sweeney's arguments and affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP77 Sweeney v. Petska, et al.

Dist III, Chippewa County, Cameron, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Willett, Stephen D., Phillips; For Respondent: Isaacson, James M., Chippewa Falls; Hertel, Harry R., Eau Claire

Related Content

Termination of Parental Rights-Preservation of Key Objections

Julia appeals from circuit court orders terminating her parental rights to her children, Nathan and Neil.2 Jul[...]

April 22, 2024

Termination of Parental Rights

Ralph appeals from orders terminating his parental rights to his son, Neil, and to his daughter, Peggy.3 Ralph[...]

April 22, 2024

Involuntary Commitment

Caleb appeals an order for his involuntary commitment pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.20 and an order for his inv[...]

April 22, 2024

Sentence Modification

Romero M. Watson appeals from an order of the postconviction court denying his motion requesting sentence modi[...]

April 22, 2024

Contract

Aaron Carmody and Nicole Elizabeth Carmody, both pro se, appeal from the circuit court’s order, entered afte[...]

April 22, 2024

Right to Remain Silent-Plea Withdrawal

Higgins appeals from a judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree intentional homicide and one count[...]

April 22, 2024

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People