Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2005AP747-CR State v. Powe

By: dmc-admin//January 2, 2007//

2005AP747-CR State v. Powe

By: dmc-admin//January 2, 2007//

Listen to this article

Eddie S. Powe appeals from a reconfinement order and a related postconviction order. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a reconfinement period that exceeded all of the recommendations. We conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in determining the reconfinement period, and that the postconviction court demonstrated the trial court’s exercise of discretion along with its own when denying Powe’s postconviction motion. Therefore, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dugan, Kahn, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Martin, Richard D., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Donohoo, Robert D., Milwaukee; Campbell, Shunette T., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests