By: dmc-admin//May 28, 2002//
Thomas J. Otto appeals from an order dismissing his complaint against Milwaukee County, which alleged violations of Wis. Stat. sec. 109.01(3) (1999-2000), breach of contract, and promissory estoppel. Otto claims: (1) the law of the case doctrine precluded a subsequent trial court from dismissing his claims because the first trial court denied earlier dispositive motions; (2) dismissal of his Wis. Stat. ch. 109 claim was erroneous; (3) the trial court erred when it dismissed his breach of contract claim based on insufficient pleadings; (4) the trial court erred when it granted Milwaukee County summary judgment dismissing his promissory estoppel claim; and (5) the trial court erred when it made damage determinations.
Because we resolve each issue in favor of upholding the judgment, we affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Lamelas, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Lynne Layber, Milwaukee
For Respondent: Timothy R. Schoewe, Milwaukee