Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-1014 Hamilton v. Hamilton

By: dmc-admin//April 1, 2002//

01-1014 Hamilton v. Hamilton

By: dmc-admin//April 1, 2002//

Listen to this article

However, because the new statute of limitations (Wis. Stat. sec. 893.40) took effect on July 1, 1980 and now requires that an action on a judgment be brought within twenty years of the time the judgment “is entered,” and the amended judgment which Walter was violating by missing payments was entered in November 1977, we conclude that this action, filed in May, 2000 is beyond the requisite 20 years and is time-barred.

“In summary, the State’s action was timely under §§ 893.14 and 893.16(1) with respect to arrearages accumulating prior to July 1, 1980. However, the State’s action was time-barred by § 893.40 with respect to arrearages that accumulated starting July 1, 1980.

Because the circuit court’s order did not segregate these time periods, we reverse the entire order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, Dane County, Nichol, J., Lundsten, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Robert A. Ramsdell, Madison

For Respondent: Randy A. Woodford, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests