01-1832 State v. Krohn

By: dmc-admin//March 11, 2002//

Listen to this article

“While we accept Krohn’s challenge to the circuit court’s restitution order, we reject his attempt to prevent the court from properly determining restitution and issuing the appropriate restitution order.

Consistent with ‘the goal [of Wis. Stat. § 973.20] of facilitating complete restitution for the victim,’ see Perry, 181 Wis. 2d at 56, we: (1) reverse the portion of the judgment of conviction that addresses restitution; (2) reverse the orders denying Krohn’s motion to vacate and his motion to reconsider; and (3) remand the case to the circuit court with instructions to vacate the restitution order, determine restitution in a manner consistent with the requirements of § 973.20(13), and enter the appropriate restitution order.”

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Barron, Wagner, JJ., Schudson, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jeffrey K. Krohn, Sayre, OK

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; William C. Wolford, Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event