By: dmc-admin//March 11, 2002//
“The net result in this case is that Global received its property with a present value of $5,225 plus a damage award of $34,070.83, representing the diminution in value of the property during the years of storage with Ecklund. Contrary to Ecklund’s argument, these combined remedies do not constitute a windfall to Global. Rather, they make Global whole, which is precisely what Wis. Stat. § 810.14 and Commercial Investment Trust envision.”
However, because the law governing replevin is so dated, we cannot conclude that this appeal is frivolous.
Affirmed.
Dist II, Winnebago County, Key, J., Nettesheim, J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Charles J. Hertel, Oshkosh
For Respondent: Paul Rosenfeldt, Fond du Lac