Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2206 State v. Molinaro

By: dmc-admin//January 21, 2002//

01-2206 State v. Molinaro

By: dmc-admin//January 21, 2002//

Listen to this article

Richard Molinaro, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. Following his guilty pleas, Molinaro was convicted of attempting to elude an officer as a repeater and sentenced to eight years in prison. He was also convicted of hit and run involving injury as a repeater and sentenced to three years in prison, consecutive to the eluding conviction but concurrent with his present parole revocation. Molinaro argues that he is entitled to an amendment to his sentences, because the repeater allegations were not proved and his sentences exceed the maximum allowed by law.

We reject his arguments and affirm the order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Lenz, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Richard A. Molinaro, Appleton, MN

For Respondent: Meri C. Larson, Eau Claire; Francisco X. Vasquez, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests