00-3196 In Re the Marriage of: Gray v. Gray

By: dmc-admin//January 21, 2002//

Listen to this article

Mary Jo Gray appeals an order granting Mark Gray’s motion to reduce his child support obligation, setting his arrearage at $4,000, and denying Mary Jo’s motion to find Mark in contempt. She argues that the trial court incorrectly computed Mark’s base monthly income and should not have subtracted legal fees, that Mark’s testimony was incredible and he did not initially overpay child support, that Mark’s employment change constituted shirking, that he should have been held in contempt for his failure to share the children’s pretrial medical expenses and that he should be compelled to contribute toward her attorney fees in this matter.

We reject those arguments and affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, St. Croix County, Lundell, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Francis Rivard, Menomonie

For Respondent: Philip P. Todryk, Hudson

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event