01-0707-CR State v. Schulte

By: dmc-admin//November 19, 2001//

Listen to this article

Corey Schulte appeals a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test administered following his arrest. Schulte concedes, however, that under the holding in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199, 238 Wis.2d 666, 618 N.W.2d 240, the trial court did not err in rejecting his claim that the arresting officer was constitutionally required to administer a breath test instead of the “more intrusive” blood test.

Accordingly, we affirm the appealed judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist IV, Sauk County, Taggart, J., Deininger, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Ralph A. Kalal, Madison

For Respondent: Patricia A. Barrett, Baraboo

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event