01-0223 Village of Greendale v. Kramschuster

Listen to this article

Stephanie Kramschuster appeals from an order assessing a fine and costs against her after a jury found Kramschuster guilty of the Village of Greendale’s municipal charge of theft. Kramschuster also appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion to set aside the jury verdict. On appeal, Kramschuster argues that the verdict should be set aside because: (1) the circuit court judge failed to divulge that she was a resident of the village of Greendale; (2) her motion seeking to suppress her inculpatory statements should have been granted; (3) the trial court, although granting her motion to sequester witnesses, did not enforce the order; (4) several of the village’s witnesses perjured themselves during the trial; and (5) there was insufficient proof submitted by the village to support the accusation that Kramschuster had no authority to mark down the prices on the merchandise the store claimed she reduced and then purchased.

This court affirms.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, DiMotto, J., Curley, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Stephanie Kramschuster, Franklin

For Respondent: Cynthia A. Lepkowski, Greendale