Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

patents

May 13, 2013

Report: Patent pools may stifle competition

Patent pools, designed to spur innovation and reduce the cost of litigation, may actually be having anticompetitive effects according to a report released by the former competition policy director for the Federal Trade Commission.

Apr 16, 2013

Court struggles with question of human gene patentability

Drawing a legal line to determine when human genetic material ceases to be a creation of nature and instead becomes a patentable product is not easy — even for the U.S. Supreme Court.

Sep 27, 2012

Patent law overhaul starting to show its effects

Portions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, or the “AIA,” took effect earlier this month. It’s been called the most significant overhaul of U.S. patent law in decades.

Aug 3, 2012

DuPont to appeal record-setting $1 billion verdict for Monsanto

DuPont officials plan to appeal a federal jury’s record-setting $1-billion verdict that found the company willfully infringed a patent held by Monsanto.

Apr 18, 2012

Intellectual Property – patents — evidence

10-1219 Kappos v. Hyatt

Apr 17, 2012

Intellectual Property – patents — counterclaims

10-844 Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., v. Novo Nordisk, A/S

Mar 20, 2012

Intellectual Property — patents

10-1150 Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

Jun 7, 2011

09-1159 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

Intellectual Property Patents; federal contractors The Bayh-Dole Act does not automatically vest title to federally funded  inventions in federal contractors or authorize contractors to unilaterally take  title to such inventions. Section 202(a), which states that contractors may “elect to retain title,”  confirms that the Act does not vest title. Stanford reaches the opposite  conclusion,[...]

May 31, 2011

10-6 Global-Tech Appliances, Inc., v. SEB S.A.

Intellectual Property Patents; induced infringement Induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(b) requires knowledge that the induced acts constitute patent infringement. Induced infringement was not considered a separate theory of indirect liability in the pre-1952 case law, but was treated as evidence of “contributory infringement,” i.e., the aiding and abetting of direct infringement by anoth[...]

Apr 25, 2011

Patent Office pilot programs slowly ease backlog (UPDATE)

Over the past two years, patent attorneys have seen marked differences in the way patent applications are handled, and how a backlog of 700,000-plus filed patent applications are being tackled, by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests