Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Disability benefits

Jun 3, 2011

10-2654 McKinzey v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits Where a disability claimant’s treating physician opined that she was exaggerating her symptoms and limitations, the ALJ’s denial of benefits is affirmed. “[W]hat McKinzey’s account of the credibility determination leaves out is the final reason given by the ALJ, namely that, ‘[i]n addition, the record includes evidence strongly suggesting that claimant [[...]

May 27, 2011

10-3454 Bassett v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits; attorney fees Where the precise date when a disability benefits applicant became eligible is debatable, the applicant is not entitled to attorney fees incurred in successfully establishing an eligibility date. “We do not think that Chief Judge McCuskey abused his discretion when he decided that the commissioner’s position in Bassett’s case […]

Jan 24, 2011

09-3064 Punzio v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits Where a vocational expert confirmed that the mental limitations identified by the psychiatrist would preclude a disability claimant from working at any job, the only possible outcome is a finding that she is disabled. “Dr. Mahmood’s assessment of Punzio’s mental residual functional capacity is well supported and consistent with the medical […]

Jan 13, 2011

10-2006 Allord v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits Where the ALJ did not adequately say why he discounted the opinion of a disability applicant’s treating physician, the case must be remanded. “Allord is correct that the Social Security Administration is bound to give a treating physician’s opinion controlling weight if her ‘opinion on the issue(s) of the nature and […]

Jan 13, 2011

10-2006 Allord v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits Where the ALJ did not adequately say why he discounted the opinion of a disability applicant’s treating physician, the case must be remanded. “Allord is correct that the Social Security Administration is bound to give a treating physician’s opinion controlling weight if her ‘opinion on the issue(s) of the nature and […]

Dec 6, 2010

10-1314 Campbell v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits Where the ALJ ignored portions of a physician’s report suggesting a disability, the denial of disability benefits must be reversed. “An ALJ may not selectively discuss portions of a physician’s report that support a finding of non-disability while ignoring other portions that suggest a disability. Myles v. Astrue, 582 F.3d 672, […]

Dec 6, 2010

10-2083 Spiva v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits Where the ALJ’s opinion contained no analysis how the disability applicant could do his previous job, the denial of benefits must be reversed. “The administrative law judge’s opinion is unsatisfactory, and likewise the government’s brief and oral argument, which misstate the record in several places and, worse, seem determined to dissolve […]

Nov 29, 2010

09-4083 O’Connor-Spinner v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits Where the ALJ failed to include the limitations of a disability claimant in a hypothetical question to a vocational expert, the denial of benefits must be reversed. “We acknowledge that there may be instances where a lapse on the part of the ALJ in framing the hypothetical will not result in […]

Oct 22, 2010

09-3282 Jones v. Astrue

Public Health Disability benefits Where an ALJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by the medical evidence, the opinions of treating physicians, and the claimant’s daily activities, the disability claim was properly denied. “Jones implies that the ALJ based the credibility determination on the absence of medical evidence. Although the ALJ reported that Dr. Karr did [...]

Oct 13, 2010

2009AP2053 Miller v. Sawyer County, et al.

Employment Disability benefits Donald Miller appeals a judgment affirming a Labor and Industry Review Commission decision that denied Miller duty disability benefits under Wis. Stat. § 40.65. Miller contends he has satisfied the statute’s severity requirement, and is therefore eligible for benefits, because his disability has caused a reduction in his pay and has adversely […]

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests