Due Process Violation – Time-barred
Clarence Easterling, a Wisconsin inmate, brought this action against correctional officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, contending that they violated his constitutional rights to due process of law and freedom of association by denying him visits with his daughter in 2004 and 2013.
Medical Malpractice – Negligence
In this appeal, John Lipsey seeks relief on behalf of his minor daughter J.L., for tragic injuries suffered by J.L. at birth.
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Violation – Rule 11
Cory Williams was charged with two counts of Hobbs Act robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a); one count of bank robbery, id. § 2113(a), (d); and three counts of brandishing a firearm in furtherance of those crimes, id. § 924(c).
ADA Violation
Yasas Rodrigo sued his employer, Carle Foundation Hospital (“Carle”), for violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“Act”).
Preemption Claim
E.F. Transit, Inc., is a motor carrier licensed in the state of Indiana to transport beer, wine, and liquor.
Sufficiency of Evidence
We review a decision of the court of appeals, affirming the circuit court's grant of summary judgment dismissing Debra Sands' claims and Menard, Inc.'s counterclaim.
Termination of Parental Rights – Issues of Material Fact
R.I. appeals an order terminating his parental rights to M.J., his biological daughter who is an Indian child. R.I. is not of Native American heritage.
Court Error – Suppression of Evidence
Brandon Scherz was charged with second-degree sexual assault, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia.
Sentence Modification – Mitigating Evidence
Fontaine Baker was charged with first-degree intentional homicide while armed in the shooting death of Frankie Jenkins.
Joinder of Cases
Edward Cintron appeals one criminal judgment convicting him of attempted first-degree sexual assault of a child under twelve, and another criminal judgment convicting him of two counts of fourth-degree sexual assault and two counts of disorderly conduct.
Termination of Parental Rights
M.K. appeals from orders terminating her parental rights for two of her biological children, B.A. and L.K. She asserts that the trial court did not appropriately exercise its discretion in granting the termination of her parental rights because it did not sufficiently consider the statutory standard and factors relating to termination.
Legal News
- Milwaukee County District Attorney, UWM police address Jewish threats
- With GOP convention over, Milwaukee weighs the benefits of hosting political rivals
- Secret Service head resigns as Congress formally investigates
- Milwaukee Police Department issues statement regarding video release policy
- GOP convention sets the stage for the Democratic convention in Chicago, activists and police say
- Survey: Harris has enough delegates to be nominee
- Outside the RNC, small Milwaukee businesses and their regulars tried to salvage a sluggish week
- Biden called to resign immediately after the president announces he won’t seek reelection
- Biden drops out of 2024 presidential race, endorses Harris
- Local PA cops allegedly thought Trump’s would-be assassin was Secret Service
- Biden-Lead Secret Service admits agency denied past requests by Trump’s campaign for tighter security
- Class action filed against Walgreens
Case Digests
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Double Jeopardy; Sentencing
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Sexual Assault-Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Contract-Negligence
- Criminal Law; Juvenile Law; Discovery
- Family Law; Child Support; Property Division First paragraph(s)
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel- Exclusion of Evidence of Witness Bias
- Postconviction Relief-Sentencing-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- 14th Amendment – Due Process
- Criminal-Sentencing Guidelines – Enhancement
- Bankruptcy-Tax
- Civil Rights – 14th Amendment-Jury Instructions
- Contract; Foreclosure and Property