Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Habeas Relief – Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//February 21, 2022//

Habeas Relief – Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//February 21, 2022//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Mark Anderson v. Deanna Brookhart

Case No.: 20-3330

Officials: KANNE, BRENNAN, and KIRSCH, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Habeas Relief – Sufficiency of Evidence

An Illinois jury found Mark Anderson guilty of murdering one man outside a Chicago sandwich shop and shooting at another who had fled. Anderson seeks habeas relief, arguing that the jury lacked sufficient evidence to convict him of shooting towards the man who had fled and that the Illinois Appellate Court unreasonably applied Supreme Court precedent in ruling otherwise. Because the Illinois Appellate Court reasonably applied Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), in upholding Anderson’s conviction, we affirm the denial of habeas relief.

Affirmed
Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests