Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//January 17, 2022//

Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//January 17, 2022//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: United States of America v. Carl P. Palladinetti

Case No.: 20-2734

Officials: FLAUM, KANNE, and SCUDDER, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Sufficiency of Evidence

Carl P. Palladinetti participated in a scheme to defraud lenders into facilitating certain real estate transactions. He and his co-defendants were charged with many counts of bank fraud and making false statements. The district court held a bench trial on one of the bank fraud counts. The only issue was whether one of the banks Palladinetti defrauded was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The district court determined that it was and found him guilty. We affirm.

Affirmed

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests