By: Derek Hawkins//October 21, 2021//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel Parks
Case No.: 2021 WI 74
Focus: Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
Pending before the court is Attorney Daniel Parks’ second petition for reinstatement of his license to practice law in Wisconsin. Upon consideration of the reinstatement petition; Attorney Parks’ affidavit in support of his reinstatement petition; the Office of Lawyer Regulation’s (OLR) response pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.30(4); the parties’ SCR 22.30(5)(a) stipulation; the OLR’s memorandum in support of the stipulation (attaching Attorney Anthony O’Malley’s comment in support of reinstatement); and Attorney Parks’ response to the OLR’s memorandum, we conclude that reinstatement, upon conditions, is appropriate.
Reinstatement granted upon conditions
Concur:
Dissent: