Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Warrantless Search – Suppression of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//September 23, 2021//

Warrantless Search – Suppression of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//September 23, 2021//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District IV

Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Percy L. Oliver

Case No.: 2020AP1004-CR

Officials: Kloppenburg, Graham, and Nashold, JJ.

Focus: Warrantless Search – Suppression of Evidence

Percy L. Oliver appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree reckless homicide. Shortly after his arrest, police asked Oliver to provide a sample of his DNA and Oliver agreed to do so. On appeal, he argues that the circuit court should have suppressed the evidence obtained in this warrantless search because his consent was not voluntary. Based on the totality of the circumstances as well as the circuit court’s findings of fact and reasonable inferences, we conclude that Oliver voluntarily consented to the search. Therefore, we affirm.

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests