Evidentiary Hearing

By: Derek Hawkins//September 22, 2021//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District II

Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Malcolm A. Butler

Case No.: 2019AP637

Officials: Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J.

Focus: Evidentiary Hearing

Malcolm Butler appeals pro se from circuit court orders denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20)1 motion. Because the record conclusively demonstrates that Butler was not entitled to relief, we affirm the circuit court’s orders denying the motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Full Text

Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event