Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Statutory Interpretation – FSIA

By: Derek Hawkins//May 1, 2019//

Statutory Interpretation – FSIA

By: Derek Hawkins//May 1, 2019//

Listen to this article

United States Supreme Court

Case Name: Republic of Sudan v. Rick Harrison, et al.

Case No.: 16-1094

Focus: Statutory Interpretation – FSIA

This case concerns the requirements applicable to a particular method of serving civil process on a foreign state. Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA), a foreign state may be served by means of a mailing that is “addressed and dispatched . . . to the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of the foreign state concerned.” 28 U. S. C. §1608(a)(3). The question now before us is whether this provision is satisfied when a service packet that names the foreign minister is mailed to the foreign state’s embassy in the United States. We hold that it is not. Most naturally read, §1608(a)(3) requires that a mailing be sent directly to the foreign minister’s office in the minister’s home country.

Reversed and remanded

Dissenting: THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Concurring:

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

Should additional funding and resources be given to the Secret Service?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests