By: Derek Hawkins//April 24, 2019//
United States Supreme Court
Case Name: Theodore H. Frank, et al. v. Paloma Gaos, et al.
Case No.: 17-961
Focus: Class Action – Stored Communications Violation
Three named plaintiffs brought class action claims against Google for alleged violations of the Stored Communications Act. The parties negotiated a settlement agreement that would require Google to include certain disclosures on some of its webpages and would distribute more than $5 million to cy pres recipients, more than $2 million to class counsel, and no money to absent class members. We granted certiorari to review whether such cy pres settlements satisfy the requirement that class settlements be “fair, reasonable, and adequate.” Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23(e)(2). Because there remain substantial questions about whether any of the named plaintiffs has standing to sue in light of our decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U. S. ___ (2016), we vacate the judgment of the Ninth Circuit and remand for further proceedings.
Vacated and remanded
Dissenting: THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
Concurring: