Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Estate – Bankruptcy

By: Derek Hawkins//April 15, 2019//

Estate – Bankruptcy

By: Derek Hawkins//April 15, 2019//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: City of Chicago v. Shelly C. Moore, et al.

Case No.: 17-3630; 17-3663; 17-3664

Officials: EASTERBROOK, ROVNER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Estate – Bankruptcy

An application for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code transfers most of a debtor’s assets to the newly formed bankruptcy estate. 11 U.S.C. §§ 541, 1306. Property stays in the estate until the bankruptcy court confirms a plan of payment. Then, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in the plan or the order confirming the plan, the confirmation of a plan vests all of the property of the estate in the debtor.” 11 U.S.C. §1327(b). This means that the debtor becomes personally responsible for the expenses of maintaining that property.

A case-specific order, supported by good case-specific reasons, would be consistent with §1327(b), but none was entered in any of these cases. Chicago therefore is entitled to the principal relief it seeks: an order restoring the estates’ assets to the debtors’ personal ownership. Chicago tells us that, if it receives that relief, we need not decide whether parking and moving-violation fines should be treated as administrative expenses. On this understanding, we bypass that subject.

Reversed

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

Should additional funding and resources be given to the Secret Service?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests