By: Derek Hawkins//September 5, 2018//
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Shayd C. Mitchell
Case No.: 2017AP536-CR
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ.
Focus: Sufficiency of Evidence
Shayd Mitchell challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for attempted child enticement. After engaging in sexually explicit communications with a person he believed was a minor and arranging to meet that person at a Family Video store, Mitchell was arrested approximately two blocks from the designated meeting site while walking toward that location. We reject Mitchell’s argument that the evidence was insufficient for the jury to conclude he had taken an action in furtherance of his intent to commit child enticement. We also reject Mitchell’s argument that the Family Video was not a “secluded place” within the meaning of the child enticement statute, as Mitchell’s communications demonstrated that the Family Video was not the location where the sexual contact was to occur. Rather, Mitchell had offered to take the minor to his residence after their meeting at the store. We affirm.