By: Derek Hawkins//August 8, 2018//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: M.S.G. v. J.L.H., et al.
Case No.: 2017AP1098
Officials: Lundsten, P.J., Sherman and Fitzpatrick, JJ.
Focus: Due Process Violation – Paternity Testing
B.H. appeals a circuit court order adjudicating M.S.G. the father of a child born to J.L.H. after B.H. and J.L.H. married. B.H. argues that his due process and statutory rights were violated by the failure to name or join him as a party prior to the time a court commissioner issued an order for genetic testing. We assume, without deciding, that B.H. has shown a violation of his rights. We conclude, however, that the circuit court provided a sufficient remedy for this asserted violation when the court joined B.H. as a party and gave him an opportunity to participate in the circuit court’s review of the court commissioner’s decision to order testing. B.H. also argues that the circuit court erred in its application of best interest factors. We disagree. The order is affirmed.