By: Derek Hawkins//August 6, 2018//
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Ashley Dawn Baumann
Case No.: 2016AP2243-CR
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ.
Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Ashley Baumann appeals a judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting her of two counts of homicide by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.09(1)(a) (2015-16), one count of causing great bodily harm by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.25(1)(a), and one count of reckless driving causing great bodily harm contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.62(4). She also appeals an order denying her postconviction motion seeking a new trial, based upon claimed ineffective assistance by her trial counsel. Baumann contends her trial counsel was ineffective by: (1) both failing to object to and also introducing at trial improper vouching evidence from investigating law enforcement officers; (2) failing to object to both an expert report and expert testimony that improperly relied on a lay witness’s statement; (3) failing to object to a testifying officer’s inadmissible statement that Baumann was the driver of the vehicle; and (4) failing to object to evidence that victim Nicole obtained money through a civil lawsuit. She also requests a new trial in the interest of justice.
We conclude that Baumann’s trial counsel did not perform deficiently in any of the above respects. We further conclude Baumann is not entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. Accordingly, we affirm.