By: Derek Hawkins//May 29, 2018//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Fredrick A. Laux v. Dushan Zatecky
Case No.: 16-3282
Officials: RIPPLE, KANNE, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges
Focus: 6th Amendment Violation – Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
In 2002, Fredrick Laux broke into his ex‐wife’s home and murdered her with a crowbar. A jury in Grant County, Indiana, decided that the aggravating circumstance of Laux’s crime—that he committed murder during a burglary—outweighed the primary mitigating circumstance—that he had no criminal history. The jury recommended a sentence of life without parole, which the state trial judge imposed. The Indiana state courts affirmed Laux’s convictions and sentence. After a post‐conviction hearing, they also rejected the claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
In Williams v. Taylor, the Supreme Court spoke of a hypothetical “run‐of‐the‐mill state‐court decision applying the correct legal rule from our cases” that rejects a prisoner’s claim. 529 U.S. at 406. At bottom, that is this case. The district court was correct to deny habeas relief, and its decision is AFFIRMED.
Affirmed
Full Text