By: Derek Hawkins//April 10, 2018//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. John E. Henricks, III
Case No.: 17-2383
Officials: FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, and MANION, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Due Process Violation – Property Interests
John Henricks (Henricks) pleaded guilty to mail fraud and was sentenced to imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution. Henricks’s wife, Catherine, (Ms. Henricks) entered an appearance as an interested person in Henricks’s criminal case. The district court determined the parties’ interests in various property so that Henricks’s property could be directed toward restitution to his victims. Ms. Henricks appeals, arguing that the district court did not have jurisdiction to decide the parties’ property interests in Henricks’s criminal case, violated her due process rights by not allowing her an opportunity to present her case, and improperly determined the parties’ interests in particular property. In so far as the district court had jurisdiction to determine the parties’ property interests in the criminal case and did not violate Ms. Henricks’s due process rights, we affirm. However, because the district court relied upon post‐judgment conduct instead of determining the parties’ property interests as of the date of the judgment lien, we vacate the district court’s property‐interest determination and remand for further proceedings.
Vacated and Remanded