Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Restitution

By: Derek Hawkins//March 19, 2018//

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Restitution

By: Derek Hawkins//March 19, 2018//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: United States of America v. Christopher A. Jansen

Case No.: 17-1005

Officials: FLAUM, SYKES, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Restitution

Defendant Christopher Jansen pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud and one count of tax evasion. He later sought to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing it was not “knowing and voluntary” because of ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court denied that motion, holding that Jansen’s counsel was not ineffective. We affirm. On the limited issue of restitution, we remand to allow the district court to clarify that its imposition of restitution is a condition of supervised release rather than a criminal penalty.

Affirmed in part. Remanded in part.

Full Text


Attorney Derek A. Hawkins is the managing partner at Hawkins Law Offices LLC, where he heads up the firm’s startup law practice. He specializes in business formation, corporate governance, intellectual property protection, private equity and venture capital funding and mergers & acquisitions. Check out the website at www.hawkins-lawoffices.com or contact them at 262-737-8825.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests